【摘要】A statistically significant research finding should not be defined as a P-value of 0.05 or less, because this definition does not take into account study power. Statistical significance was originally defined by Fisher RA as a P-value of 0.05 or less. According to Fisher, any finding that is likely to occur by random variation no more than 1 in 20 times is considered significant. Neyman J and Pearson ES subsequently argued that Fisher’s definition was incomplete. They proposed that statistical significance could only be determined by analyzing the chance of incorrectly considering a study finding was significant(a Type Ⅰ?error) or incorrectly considering a study finding was insignificant(a Type Ⅱ error). Their definition of statistical significance is also incomplete because the error rates are considered separately, not together. A better definition of statistical significance is the positive predictive value of a P-value, which is equal to the power divided by the sum of power and the P-value. This definition is more complete and relevant than Fisher’s or Neyman-Peason’s definitions, because it takes into account both concepts of statistical significance. Using this definition, a statistically significant finding requires a P-value of 0.05 or less when the power is at least 95%, and a P-value of 0.032 or less when the power is 60%. To achieve statistical significance, P-values must be adjusted downward as the study power decreases.
【关键词】
《建筑知识》 2015-05-12
《中国医疗管理科学》 2015-05-12
《中国医疗管理科学》 2015-05-12
《中国医疗管理科学》 2015-05-12
《数字家庭》 2015-07-03
《重庆与世界》 2015-07-01
《重庆高教研究》 2015-06-29
《现代制造技术与装备》 2015-06-25
Copyright © 2013-2016 ZJHJ Corporation,All Rights Reserved
发表评论
登录后发表评论 (已发布 0条)点亮你的头像 秀出你的观点